n8n vs Make
Both are the answer to not wanting Zapier. One is easier to start, the other is yours to run. Both prices were read from their own pricing pages on 28 August 2026.
Which should you pick?
Both build branching workflows visually and neither is Zapier, which is usually why somebody is looking at them. Make is the easier start: three thousand apps, a visual builder that handles loops and error paths properly, and a free tier of a thousand operations a month, so you can find out whether it fits before paying anything. n8n is the technical answer. It is open source, the Community Edition self-hosts free forever, and its cloud plans include unlimited users rather than charging per seat, which is the thing that quietly makes the alternatives expensive once a team touches them. The trade is real. Self-hosting means a server and somebody to look after it, and n8n's cloud execution caps bite quickly on anything AI-heavy. Pick Make if you want it working this afternoon and you are willing to count operations. Pick n8n if you would rather run it yourself, need real code inside a workflow, or expect enough people using it that per-seat pricing becomes the deciding number.
n8n and Make, side by side
| n8n | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | From €20/mo | Free, then $10.20/mo |
| Free tier | No | 1,000 operations/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-min interval, 5MB file cap |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Plans | 4 | 5 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Integrations | 500+ nodes + code | 3,000+ apps |
| Self-hostable | Yes (open source) | No |
| AI steps | Yes, native AI agents | Yes (OpenAI/AI modules) |
| Free tier | Free self-hosted only | 1,000 ops/mo |
| Pricing model | Per execution/mo (cloud) | Per operation/mo, tiered |
| Learning curve | Medium-high | Medium |
Rows where both are the same are dimmed, so what is left is the actual difference.
What n8n is good at
- Open source; self-host Community Edition free forever
- Code nodes plus AI agents for deep customization
- Unlimited users included on every cloud plan
Where it falls short
- More technical than Zapier or Make
- Self-hosting needs your own server and DevOps
- Cloud execution caps bite fast for heavy AI use
What Make is good at
- Cheaper per-operation cost than Zapier at scale
- Visual builder handles branching, loops and errors well
- Large app and HTTP/webhook library for edge cases
Where it falls short
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier for beginners
- Operation-based pricing still unpredictable for spiky usage
- Best modules and file limits gated to upper tiers
Neither of these? All 6 workflow automation tools, compared on what they actually cost.